Ottawa Ankle Rules

Assessment of the need for radiography after an ankle or midfoot trauma.

Malleolar Zone (Ankle)
Bone tenderness along the distal 6 cm of the posterior edge of the tibia or fibula.
Midfoot Zone
Bone tenderness at the base of the 5th metatarsal or the navicular bone.
Functional Assessment
Inability to bear weight both immediately after the injury AND in the emergency department (4 steps, limping is allowed).

Understanding the Ottawa Ankle Rules

The Ottawa Ankle Rules are a globally recognized clinical decision-making tool developed by Dr. Ian Stiell in Canada. They help rapidly identify patients who require an X-ray after an acute ankle or midfoot injury.

Why use these rules?

In emergency departments, the vast majority of ankle sprains (up to 85%) do not involve a fracture. Routine use of radiography leads to unnecessary radiation exposure, increased wait times, and significant healthcare costs. Strict application of the Ottawa Rules reduces unnecessary X-rays by 30-40% while maintaining nearly 100% sensitivity for detecting fractures.

Global Risk Interpretation

Ottawa Criteria Risk Level Clinical Action
0 positive criteria (Can walk + no bone tenderness) Low Risk (Simple Sprain) No X-ray. Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation (RICE).
Malleolar pain OR Inability to walk High Risk (Suspected Ankle) Ankle X-ray (AP and Lateral views).
Midfoot pain OR Inability to walk High Risk (Suspected Midfoot) Foot X-ray (AP, Lateral, and Oblique views).

Conditions of Application and Limitations

  • Age: Primarily validated for patients over 5 years old.
  • Exclusions: Do not apply if the patient is intoxicated, has a head injury, or has distracting multiple injuries.
  • Neuropathy: Unreliable in cases of diminished sensation in the lower limbs (e.g., advanced diabetes).
  • Massive Edema: If extreme swelling prevents direct bone palpation, an immediate X-ray may be justified.

Clinical Reliability

The Ottawa Ankle Rules have a sensitivity of 97 to 100%. A "negative" result (no targeted bone pain and ability to walk) almost certainly rules out a fracture. However, their specificity is moderate: a "positive" result does not necessarily mean a fracture is present, but an X-ray is required to check.

Written by : Dr. NEZZAR NARIMANE (General Surgeon)
Published on : 11-04-2026
Last updated :

Scientific References:

1. Stiell IG, et al. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. JAMA. 1994 Mar 16;271(11):827-32. [JAMA Network]
2. Bachmann LM, et al. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):417. [BMJ Journal]

Rate the usefulness of this clinical tool:

💡 Committed to scientific accuracy, if you notice any clinical or technical discrepancy, please let us know.